Skip to main content
Detailed Comparison

Aelira vs YuJa Panorama

Which accessibility tool is right for your university?

An honest comparison of features, pricing, and value. Both tools serve higher education—but they solve different problems.

Executive Summary

Aelira

Document remediation platform with AI-generated fixes

What It Does:

Remediates PDFs, PowerPoints, and LaTeX equations using AI. Generates working fixes you can copy-paste immediately.

Best For:

  • STEM departments (LaTeX/MathML support)
  • Bulk document processing (thousands of files)
  • Source remediation (fix original files)
  • Privacy-first institutions (self-hosted AI)

Pricing:

$999/month

Per department, unlimited files

YuJa Panorama

LMS scanning overlay for accessibility detection

What It Does:

Scans content within Canvas/Blackboard LMS and identifies accessibility issues. Does not generate fixes.

Best For:

  • LMS-embedded content scanning
  • Issue identification (not remediation)
  • Faculty awareness campaigns
  • Large enterprise budgets

Pricing:

$10K-$50K/year

Institution-wide license

Key Difference

YuJa Panorama identifies problems. Faculty still manually remediate every issue. Aelira generates working fixes—AI produces accessible HTML, MathML, and corrected PowerPoint files you can use immediately. They serve different needs.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

A fair, detailed analysis of what each tool does well

FeatureAeliraYuJa Panorama
AI-Generated Working Fixes

Working code/HTML

Identifies only

LaTeX/MathML Remediation

Full conversion

Not supported

Bulk Document Processing

CLI + directories

Privacy (Self-Hosted AI)

Open-source models

Cloud only

LMS Integration

Canvas/Blackboard

Price per Department
$999/mo
$10K-$50K/yr

What YuJa Panorama Does Well

YuJa is an established tool with real strengths

LMS Integration

YuJa Panorama integrates directly into Canvas and Blackboard. Faculty can scan course content without leaving the LMS. This is convenient for quick accessibility checks.

Enterprise Support

YuJa provides dedicated account managers, training programs, and enterprise-grade SLAs. If you need white-glove service and have the budget, YuJa delivers.

Faculty Awareness

The LMS overlay alerts faculty to accessibility issues in real-time as they upload content. This raises awareness across campus and encourages compliance.

Market Leader

YuJa is trusted by hundreds of universities. If you need a proven vendor with a long track record, YuJa is a safe choice.

What YuJa Can't Do (And Why That Matters)

YuJa identifies problems—but faculty still do all the work

No Remediation (Only Detection)

YuJa tells you what's wrong. It doesn't fix anything. Faculty still need to manually add alt text, fix contrast, retype PDFs, and review videos.

Faculty quote (Reddit): "YuJa is varying levels of suck that won't actually fix the problem."

No LaTeX/MathML Support

95-99% of STEM faculty use LaTeX for equations. YuJa cannot convert LaTeX to accessible MathML or add ARIA labels for screen readers.

Faculty quote: "Math professors will just stop providing resources if forced to manually convert thousands of equations."

Limited Bulk Processing

YuJa processes files one at a time within the LMS. No CLI or batch processing for thousands of historical documents.

Aelira alternative: Command-line batch processing. Scan 1,000 files in a single directory command.

Expensive (10-50x Higher Cost)

YuJa pricing: $10,000-$50,000 per year for institution-wide licenses.

5-Year Total Cost:

  • Aelira: $59,940
  • YuJa: $50,000-$250,000
  • Save $40K-$190K with Aelira

What Aelira Does Differently

We don't just identify problems—we generate fixes

AI-Generated Fixes

Upload a scanned PDF. Aelira returns accessible HTML with proper heading structure, alt text, and working code you can copy-paste.

Faculty save 40-80 hours per course.

LaTeX/MathML (UNIQUE)

Aelira is the ONLY tool that converts LaTeX equations to accessible MathML with ARIA labels for screen readers.

NO COMPETITOR HAS THIS.

Privacy-First

Your content never touches OpenAI or Google. Open-source AI models (Ollama) with self-hosted option (MIT license).

Free tier available.

Which Tool Should You Choose?

Honest guidance based on your specific needs

Choose YuJa If:

You only need issue identification

Faculty can handle manual remediation

LMS integration is critical

Must work exclusively within Canvas/Blackboard

Large enterprise budget

$10K-$50K/year is within budget

Choose Aelira If:

You need actual remediation

AI-generated fixes save 40-80 hours per course

STEM departments with LaTeX

No other tool does this

Bulk document processing

Thousands of files via CLI

Budget is a concern

80-90% cheaper than YuJa

Can You Use Both?

Yes! Many universities use YuJa for LMS scanning (faculty awareness) and Aelira for actual remediation (generate fixes). They complement each other.

What Faculty Actually Think

Real quotes from Reddit r/Professors

On YuJa Panorama

"YuJa Panorama is varying levels of suck that won't actually fix the problem."

— r/Professors faculty member

On the LaTeX Problem

"95-99% of all mathematicians use LaTeX to compile PDFs. Microsoft Equation Editor is restrictive, less efficient, requires paid services."

— r/Professors STEM faculty

Ready to Try Aelira?

Join the pilot program and see how AI-generated fixes save your faculty 40-80 hours per course

Launching Q1 2026 (January) · 30-day free trial · No credit card required